#12  Are we fighting crime or ticking boxes? | Oonagh van den Berg

Loading player...
Discover what FSIs can do (and should do) but don't do, to fight crime.

This episode with Oonagh van den Berg of Raw Compliance takes a bold step in re-looking at how we comply with our AML regulatory requirements.

Oonagh argues that many current control frameworks are not fully fit for purpose as they were designed for a slower financial world and struggle to keep up with instant payments, embedded finance, crypto, and AI-driven fraud. While these frameworks may be technically compliant, they lack operational effectiveness.

The conversation covers issues of overregulation, data fragmentation, the disconnect between compliance and business operations, and the limitations of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) evaluations.

Oonagh advocates for a shift from rule-based to data-first, dynamic, and tech-enabled frameworks that can adapt to evolving criminal behaviours. She stresses the importance of compliance officers developing skills in data analytics, technology, and business understanding rather than focusing solely on regulatory knowledge
Chapters
  • 00:02 Introduction to financial crime framework challenges
  • 02:27 Are current financial control frameworks fit for purpose?
  • 05:02 The impact of overregulation on risk management
  • 07:08 Principles-based vs rules-based regulation
  • 09:53 Data fragmentation and its impact on financial crime control
  • 12:59 AI implementation challenges in financial institutions
  • 16:35 Excessive complexity in compliance processes
  • 21:00 Practical challenges in compliance requirements
  • 25:18 Bridging the gap between regulation and business
  • 34:14 FATF evaluations and effective enforcement
  • 39:08 Final advice for compliance professionals
Season 1 / Episode 12 19 Dec 2025 English South Africa Documentary · Business

Other recent episodes

The Wolfsberg Questionnaire: Compliance Theatre or Effective Due Diligence?

Are we genuinely assessing financial crime or ticking a box? Is the Wolfsberg Correspondent Banking Due Diligence Questionnaire genuinely helping to combat money laundering, or has it become another costly compliance exercise? Dawn Pretorius challenges the value of the Wolfsberg Questionnaire and the many variations developed by banks and compliance…
Season 1 / Episode 21 13 min

Drowning in Suspicious Transaction Reports, Starving for Intelligence

Billions of data points but little financial crime disruption at best! Are We Fighting Money Laundering or Just Collecting Reports? The global anti-money laundering system is built on a fundamental assumption: the more suspicious transactions we report, the better equipped authorities will be to detect and disrupt financial crime. But…
Season 1 / Episode 20 14 min

Have We Lost the War on Money Laundering? | Professor Louis de Koker

For more than three decades, the world has invested billions in the fight against money laundering. But has all that investment actually reduced crime — or simply displaced it? In this compelling conversation, Dawn Pretorius speaks to Professor Louis de Koker, one of the leading voices in financial crime research,…
Season 1 / Episode 19 43 min

The great anti-money laundering illusion

The global AML system is getting better at compliance — but is it getting better at stopping criminals? Dawn Pretorius challenges the effectiveness of the world's anti-money laundering architecture, drawing on FATF's own concerns about the gap between technical compliance and real-world outcomes. From ineffective risk-based approaches and beneficial ownership…
Season 1 / Episode 18 12 min

The Zondo Files

The red flags were there. Why didn't anybody stop it? The Zondo Commission exposed far more than corruption — it exposed the weaknesses of the systems meant to prevent it. This episode explores the AML lessons hidden within South Africa's state capture saga, including PEP risk, consulting fee abuse, governance…
Season 1 / Episode 17 14 min